JOHN W DODD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

122

30%

LEVEL 2

154

38%

LEVEL 3

84

21%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

213

38%

LEVEL 2

168

30%

LEVEL 3

108

19%

LEVEL 4

74

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

83

39%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

150

46%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

51

42%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

60

37%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

145

42%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

101

27%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

206

37%

LEVEL 2

165

30%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

74

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

21

66%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

125
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

79

23%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

180
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

154

31%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

74

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

43

78%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

59

80%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

99

35%

LEVEL 2

115

41%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

170

44%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

124
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

122

31%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

181
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

208

37%

LEVEL 2

166

30%

LEVEL 3

108

19%

LEVEL 4

73

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.