ARCHER STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

120

45%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

108

42%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

61

47%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

52

42%

LEVEL 3

45

36%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

97

46%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

88

44%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

104

43%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

105

42%

LEVEL 3

92

37%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

16

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

97
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

83

44%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

21

27%

LEVEL 2

43

54%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

42

60%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

22

44%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

22

41%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

102

47%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

91

44%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

117

45%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.