ROOSEVELT UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,224

LEVEL 1

456

37%

LEVEL 2

477

39%

LEVEL 3

228

19%

LEVEL 4

63

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,291

LEVEL 1

451

35%

LEVEL 2

448

35%

LEVEL 3

297

23%

LEVEL 4

95

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

181

32%

LEVEL 2

226

40%

LEVEL 3

127

22%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

218
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

187

31%

LEVEL 2

202

33%

LEVEL 3

163

27%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

275

42%

LEVEL 2

251

38%

LEVEL 3

101

15%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

264

39%

LEVEL 2

246

36%

LEVEL 3

134

20%

LEVEL 4

40

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

146
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

274

42%

LEVEL 2

229

35%

LEVEL 3

114

18%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

195
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

243

37%

LEVEL 2

222

34%

LEVEL 3

152

23%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,069

LEVEL 1

365

34%

LEVEL 2

420

39%

LEVEL 3

221

21%

LEVEL 4

63

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,131

LEVEL 1

348

31%

LEVEL 2

401

35%

LEVEL 3

287

25%

LEVEL 4

95

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

91

59%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

103

64%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

276
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 924

LEVEL 1

253

27%

LEVEL 2

395

43%

LEVEL 3

213

23%

LEVEL 4

63

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

365
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 995

LEVEL 1

280

28%

LEVEL 2

350

35%

LEVEL 3

273

27%

LEVEL 4

92

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

203

68%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

171

58%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

77

37%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,016

LEVEL 1

379

37%

LEVEL 2

394

39%

LEVEL 3

195

19%

LEVEL 4

48

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

326
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,082

LEVEL 1

387

36%

LEVEL 2

369

34%

LEVEL 3

247

23%

LEVEL 4

79

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

285
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,184

LEVEL 1

439

37%

LEVEL 2

460

39%

LEVEL 3

223

19%

LEVEL 4

62

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

387
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,239

LEVEL 1

419

34%

LEVEL 2

433

35%

LEVEL 3

292

24%

LEVEL 4

95

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

17

43%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

32

62%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.