Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH BELLMORE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

51

11%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

159

35%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

165

33%

LEVEL 3

201

40%

LEVEL 4

67

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

56

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

109

42%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

31

42%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

126

41%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

31

40%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

154

39%

LEVEL 4

85

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

46

10%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

191

43%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

26

53%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

22

42%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

243
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

151

34%

LEVEL 3

158

36%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

266
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

163

33%

LEVEL 3

199

40%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

139

37%

LEVEL 4

80

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

46

11%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

178

42%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

22

27%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.