WOODLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

92

19%

LEVEL 3

157

32%

LEVEL 4

195

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

61

13%

LEVEL 2

99

22%

LEVEL 3

146

32%

LEVEL 4

150

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

188
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

118

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

79

37%

LEVEL 4

83

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

77

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

125
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

75

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

107
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

61

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

83

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

63

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

32

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

83

19%

LEVEL 3

150

33%

LEVEL 4

193

43%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

84

20%

LEVEL 3

142

34%

LEVEL 4

146

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

20

53%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

20

47%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

350
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

87

18%

LEVEL 3

156

33%

LEVEL 4

194

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

262
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

62

18%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

158

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

67

20%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

120

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

30

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.