BOWLING GREEN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

121

46%

LEVEL 4

57

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

113

38%

LEVEL 4

90

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

58

49%

LEVEL 4

32

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

61

43%

LEVEL 4

49

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

63

43%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

41

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

38

46%

LEVEL 4

27

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

33

36%

LEVEL 4

31

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

59

62%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

41

38%

LEVEL 4

41

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

24

31%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

32

37%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

117

53%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

107

40%

LEVEL 4

89

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

23

53%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

178
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

121

49%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

203
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

90

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

97

52%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

82

38%

LEVEL 4

80

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

25

31%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

31

37%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.