JACKSON ANNEX SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

101

36%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

50

41%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

43

33%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

66

41%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

84

48%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

23

50%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

73

33%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

91

38%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

92

35%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

25

93%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

35

81%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

64

34%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

53

47%

LEVEL 2

49

43%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

63

53%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

22

51%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

30

47%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

79

33%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

97

40%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

65

36%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

36

35%

LEVEL 2

42

41%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.