JOSEPH MCNEIL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

194

49%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

174

49%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

89

45%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

98

52%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

105

53%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

76

45%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

64

55%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

49

44%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

125

46%

LEVEL 2

99

37%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

119

51%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

156

44%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

153

47%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

38

86%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

21

75%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

112

39%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

59
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

99

38%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

82

72%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

75

77%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

29

47%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

38

44%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

165

49%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

136

50%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

139

51%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

55

44%

LEVEL 2

54

43%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.