JACKSON MAIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

108

46%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

63

53%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

59

45%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

28

43%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

19

27%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

79

49%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

98

46%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

72
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

79
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

27

35%

LEVEL 2

42

54%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

32

42%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

15

27%

LEVEL 2

24

43%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

98

49%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

73

46%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

19

24%

LEVEL 2

35

45%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.