Skip to Content
Main content

FORT PLAIN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

105

32%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

119

35%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

48

31%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

64

37%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

95

34%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

43

75%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

46

69%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

43

37%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

79

38%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

90

41%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

114

35%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.