Skip to Content
Main content

R J MCNULTY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

83

44%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

93

44%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

36

39%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

46

41%

LEVEL 2

45

40%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

47

49%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

47

48%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

20

36%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

21

36%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

53

49%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

64

48%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

63

38%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

69

38%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

20

95%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

24

80%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

73

41%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

17

89%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

74

50%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

82

50%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

81

44%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

90

45%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.