PITTSFORD CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,543
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,164

LEVEL 1

131

6%

LEVEL 2

490

23%

LEVEL 3

876

40%

LEVEL 4

667

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,542
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,133

LEVEL 1

151

7%

LEVEL 2

440

21%

LEVEL 3

820

38%

LEVEL 4

722

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

850
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,104

LEVEL 1

46

4%

LEVEL 2

208

19%

LEVEL 3

438

40%

LEVEL 4

412

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

798
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,025

LEVEL 1

52

5%

LEVEL 2

175

17%

LEVEL 3

382

37%

LEVEL 4

416

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

693
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,060

LEVEL 1

85

8%

LEVEL 2

282

27%

LEVEL 3

438

41%

LEVEL 4

255

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

744
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,108

LEVEL 1

99

9%

LEVEL 2

265

24%

LEVEL 3

438

40%

LEVEL 4

306

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

96
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

54

43%

LEVEL 4

42

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

108
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

57

43%

LEVEL 4

51

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

217
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

40

15%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

120

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

214
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

95

34%

LEVEL 4

119

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,130
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,586

LEVEL 1

86

5%

LEVEL 2

370

23%

LEVEL 3

657

41%

LEVEL 4

473

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,103
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,532

LEVEL 1

108

7%

LEVEL 2

321

21%

LEVEL 3

592

39%

LEVEL 4

511

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

47

42%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,508
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,998

LEVEL 1

71

4%

LEVEL 2

419

21%

LEVEL 3

847

42%

LEVEL 4

661

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,485
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,956

LEVEL 1

86

4%

LEVEL 2

385

20%

LEVEL 3

776

40%

LEVEL 4

709

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

71

43%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,539
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,149

LEVEL 1

124

6%

LEVEL 2

486

23%

LEVEL 3

872

41%

LEVEL 4

667

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,539
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,120

LEVEL 1

145

7%

LEVEL 2

436

21%

LEVEL 3

817

39%

LEVEL 4

722

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,511
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,104

LEVEL 1

123

6%

LEVEL 2

470

22%

LEVEL 3

854

41%

LEVEL 4

657

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,512
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,072

LEVEL 1

140

7%

LEVEL 2

420

20%

LEVEL 3

797

38%

LEVEL 4

715

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.