Skip to Content
Main content

MENDON CENTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

168

45%

LEVEL 4

104

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

73

19%

LEVEL 3

178

47%

LEVEL 4

104

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

78

42%

LEVEL 4

64

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

78

43%

LEVEL 4

66

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

90

48%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

100

50%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

15

54%

LEVEL 4

9

32%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

14

52%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

30

41%

LEVEL 4

28

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

38

45%

LEVEL 4

31

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

169
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

110

47%

LEVEL 4

59

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

111

47%

LEVEL 4

59

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

161

46%

LEVEL 4

101

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

171

49%

LEVEL 4

103

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

269
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

78

21%

LEVEL 3

166

46%

LEVEL 4

103

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

72

19%

LEVEL 3

173

47%

LEVEL 4

103

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.