BARKER ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

118

22%

LEVEL 3

184

34%

LEVEL 4

208

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

99

19%

LEVEL 3

151

29%

LEVEL 4

231

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

125

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

115

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

83

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

201
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

116

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

15

48%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

40

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

40

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

298
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

90

22%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

158

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

269
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

75

20%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

167

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

12

63%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

103

21%

LEVEL 3

177

36%

LEVEL 4

207

42%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

370
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

89

19%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

230

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

387
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

115

22%

LEVEL 3

181

34%

LEVEL 4

206

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

377
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

95

19%

LEVEL 3

148

29%

LEVEL 4

229

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.