ANNA MURRAY-DOUGLASS ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

311

61%

LEVEL 2

123

24%

LEVEL 3

53

10%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

356

66%

LEVEL 2

110

20%

LEVEL 3

49

9%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

142

54%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

167

60%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

169

70%

LEVEL 2

41

17%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

189

72%

LEVEL 2

44

17%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

24

46%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

172

65%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

198

69%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

117

66%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

126

68%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

223

55%

LEVEL 2

115

28%

LEVEL 3

50

12%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

259

60%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

47

11%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

88

89%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

97

91%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

70
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

223

57%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

51

13%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

258

62%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

40

10%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

88

77%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

98

80%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

32

45%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

298

66%

LEVEL 2

109

24%

LEVEL 3

37

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

324

69%

LEVEL 2

97

21%

LEVEL 3

37

8%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

287

61%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

51

11%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

336

65%

LEVEL 2

107

21%

LEVEL 3

49

9%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

24

71%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

20

87%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.