Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 28-HENRY HUDSON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

238

61%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

44

11%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

248

58%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

59

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

96

52%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

103

52%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

142

68%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

145

64%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

79

57%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

71

51%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

152

64%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

172

62%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

166

53%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

181

52%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

72

90%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

67

85%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

123

48%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

119

43%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

115

84%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

129

87%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

226

63%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

234

60%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

230

61%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

228

58%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

56

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.