Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 33-JOHN JAMES AUDUBON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

300

59%

LEVEL 2

154

30%

LEVEL 3

52

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

320

58%

LEVEL 2

162

30%

LEVEL 3

56

10%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

130

53%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

144

51%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

170

65%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

15

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

176

66%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

169

60%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

171

60%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

28

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

119

59%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

130

58%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

202

51%

LEVEL 2

142

36%

LEVEL 3

51

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

219

51%

LEVEL 2

148

35%

LEVEL 3

50

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

98

88%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

101

83%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

54
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

264

57%

LEVEL 2

146

31%

LEVEL 3

51

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

267

56%

LEVEL 2

150

31%

LEVEL 3

53

11%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

36

80%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

53

77%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

20

54%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

22

45%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

280

59%

LEVEL 2

147

31%

LEVEL 3

43

9%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

298

60%

LEVEL 2

145

29%

LEVEL 3

48

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

280

58%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

49

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

65
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

284

57%

LEVEL 2

148

30%

LEVEL 3

56

11%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

20

77%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

36

69%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.