BARCLAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

107

55%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

104

49%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

53

56%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

39

38%

LEVEL 3

46

44%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

54

53%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

46

43%

LEVEL 3

58

54%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

11

69%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

90

57%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

71

43%

LEVEL 3

77

46%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

11

58%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

105

61%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

101

53%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

14

61%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

109
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

106

56%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

111
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

102

49%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

61

62%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

58

55%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

46

47%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

48

45%

LEVEL 3

46

43%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

102

50%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.