Skip to Content
Main content

FRED W HILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

122

35%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

61

35%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

60

36%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

104

37%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

17

52%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

118

39%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

33

63%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

169
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

85

43%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

170
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

122

35%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.