WILLINK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

106

18%

LEVEL 2

175

29%

LEVEL 3

213

36%

LEVEL 4

102

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 623

LEVEL 1

129

21%

LEVEL 2

212

34%

LEVEL 3

158

25%

LEVEL 4

124

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

113

39%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

86

26%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

9

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

276
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

87

17%

LEVEL 2

153

30%

LEVEL 3

188

36%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

102

19%

LEVEL 2

180

34%

LEVEL 3

143

27%

LEVEL 4

106

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

84

15%

LEVEL 2

160

29%

LEVEL 3

212

38%

LEVEL 4

102

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

108

18%

LEVEL 2

206

35%

LEVEL 3

156

26%

LEVEL 4

123

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

22

58%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

280
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

77

15%

LEVEL 2

142

28%

LEVEL 3

191

38%

LEVEL 4

89

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

86

17%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

145

28%

LEVEL 4

112

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

43

41%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.