Skip to Content
Main content

PLANK ROAD SOUTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

116

47%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

122

44%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

65

48%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

71

47%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

51

45%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

51

40%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

97

49%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

102

44%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

116

49%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

122

47%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

107

49%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

106

44%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.