Skip to Content
Main content

RONALD L SODOMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

139

36%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

61

32%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

72

38%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

102

35%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

22

47%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

14

27%

LEVEL 2

20

39%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

24

59%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

17

41%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

110

31%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

29

88%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

28

80%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

118
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

132

35%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

134
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

48

36%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

107

47%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

85

35%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

120
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

135

36%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

135
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

112

30%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.