CAZENOVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

60

12%

LEVEL 2

160

32%

LEVEL 3

179

36%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

69

14%

LEVEL 2

124

24%

LEVEL 3

181

36%

LEVEL 4

133

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

88

35%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

168
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

85

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

98

37%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

153

32%

LEVEL 3

171

36%

LEVEL 4

92

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

298
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

117

24%

LEVEL 3

170

35%

LEVEL 4

128

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

175

39%

LEVEL 4

96

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

112

24%

LEVEL 3

178

38%

LEVEL 4

133

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

28

65%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

240
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

154

39%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

279
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

91

22%

LEVEL 3

155

38%

LEVEL 4

124

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

29

28%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

276
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

156

32%

LEVEL 3

179

37%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

313
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

119

24%

LEVEL 3

180

36%

LEVEL 4

133

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.