AVON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

67

30%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

127

42%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

26

28%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

24

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

41

32%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

80

47%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

57

28%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

50

25%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

106

39%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

17

81%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

21

84%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

124

42%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

39

55%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

67

61%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

119

41%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.