SOUTH LEWIS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

91

21%

LEVEL 2

159

37%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

128

29%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

131

30%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

75

36%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

84

20%

LEVEL 2

154

37%

LEVEL 3

123

29%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

120

29%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

128

31%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

119

36%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

119

36%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

50

48%

LEVEL 2

45

43%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

55

55%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

51

36%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

64

41%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

95

34%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

182
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

88

21%

LEVEL 2

159

37%

LEVEL 3

125

29%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

127

30%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

131

30%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.