Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

80

49%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

40

53%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

36

43%

LEVEL 3

32

38%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

40

47%

LEVEL 3

35

41%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

32

36%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

53

46%

LEVEL 3

42

37%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

18

17%

LEVEL 2

46

42%

LEVEL 3

38

35%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

64

47%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

58

40%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

16

64%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

23

52%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

25

64%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

63

53%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

62

47%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

73

51%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

66
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

57

37%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

11

58%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.