Skip to Content
Main content

KNICKERBOCKER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

53

43%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

59

42%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

26

46%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

29

42%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

29

43%

LEVEL 3

27

40%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

28

40%

LEVEL 3

30

43%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

7

78%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

38

39%

LEVEL 3

38

39%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

42

44%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

49

44%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

56

44%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

26

57%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

24

44%

LEVEL 3

24

44%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

37

48%

LEVEL 3

27

35%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

35

41%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

46
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

40

40%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

54
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

14

70%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.