CASE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

173

38%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

95

21%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

180

36%

LEVEL 2

177

35%

LEVEL 3

104

21%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

67

29%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

106

48%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

119

45%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

122

39%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

131

38%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

20

53%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

120

29%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

101

25%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

71

74%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

60

63%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

129
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

169

38%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

95

21%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

177

36%

LEVEL 2

175

35%

LEVEL 3

103

21%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

43

41%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

155

41%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

166

42%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

114
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

160

40%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

129
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

172

37%

LEVEL 2

160

35%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

145
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

178

36%

LEVEL 2

174

35%

LEVEL 3

104

21%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.