THOUSAND ISLANDS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

112

37%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

121

40%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

22

54%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

25

63%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

72

42%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

73

45%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

56

34%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

139
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

105

32%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

167
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

123

37%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.