GREGORY B JARVIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

162

34%

LEVEL 2

149

32%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

282

44%

LEVEL 2

196

30%

LEVEL 3

102

16%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

116

37%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

94

42%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

166

50%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

146

33%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

260

43%

LEVEL 2

180

30%

LEVEL 3

97

16%

LEVEL 4

64

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

135

33%

LEVEL 3

105

26%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

191

36%

LEVEL 2

176

33%

LEVEL 3

101

19%

LEVEL 4

64

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

53

78%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

91

81%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

133

42%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

223

54%

LEVEL 2

108

26%

LEVEL 3

50

12%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

277

43%

LEVEL 2

196

31%

LEVEL 3

100

16%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.