COXSACKIE-ATHENS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

142

31%

LEVEL 2

169

36%

LEVEL 3

123

26%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

161

29%

LEVEL 2

250

45%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

120

46%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

87

37%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

106

35%

LEVEL 2

130

43%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

111

29%

LEVEL 2

146

38%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

129

27%

LEVEL 2

216

45%

LEVEL 3

99

21%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

18

43%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

22

51%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

105

25%

LEVEL 2

155

38%

LEVEL 3

122

30%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

119

24%

LEVEL 2

232

47%

LEVEL 3

108

22%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

37

71%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

42

66%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

161

47%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

88

43%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

86

40%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

153
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

138

30%

LEVEL 2

169

37%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

158

29%

LEVEL 2

248

45%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.