Skip to Content
Main content

CATSKILL CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

232

34%

LEVEL 2

231

34%

LEVEL 3

147

22%

LEVEL 4

72

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

203

30%

LEVEL 2

234

35%

LEVEL 3

177

26%

LEVEL 4

64

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

80

24%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

143

40%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

123

36%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

31

38%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

174
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

134

29%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

114

24%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

120

26%

LEVEL 2

155

34%

LEVEL 3

131

28%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

41

59%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

31

47%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

139

25%

LEVEL 2

210

37%

LEVEL 3

141

25%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

116

20%

LEVEL 2

215

38%

LEVEL 3

174

31%

LEVEL 4

64

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

93

77%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

87

80%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 668

LEVEL 1

227

34%

LEVEL 2

226

34%

LEVEL 3

143

21%

LEVEL 4

72

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

233
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

197

30%

LEVEL 2

226

34%

LEVEL 3

170

26%

LEVEL 4

63

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

192

41%

LEVEL 2

164

35%

LEVEL 3

80

17%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

156

39%

LEVEL 2

132

33%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

218
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

228

34%

LEVEL 2

227

34%

LEVEL 3

147

22%

LEVEL 4

71

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.