GLOVERSVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,097

LEVEL 1

473

43%

LEVEL 2

359

33%

LEVEL 3

212

19%

LEVEL 4

53

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,121

LEVEL 1

481

43%

LEVEL 2

341

30%

LEVEL 3

231

21%

LEVEL 4

68

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

206

38%

LEVEL 2

180

34%

LEVEL 3

117

22%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

210

38%

LEVEL 2

168

30%

LEVEL 3

134

24%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

267

48%

LEVEL 2

179

32%

LEVEL 3

95

17%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

271

48%

LEVEL 2

173

31%

LEVEL 3

97

17%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

27

38%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

29

36%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 898

LEVEL 1

391

44%

LEVEL 2

299

33%

LEVEL 3

163

18%

LEVEL 4

45

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 891

LEVEL 1

393

44%

LEVEL 2

263

30%

LEVEL 3

182

20%

LEVEL 4

53

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

21

45%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 895

LEVEL 1

319

36%

LEVEL 2

317

35%

LEVEL 3

206

23%

LEVEL 4

53

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 918

LEVEL 1

327

36%

LEVEL 2

297

32%

LEVEL 3

226

25%

LEVEL 4

68

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

154

76%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

154

76%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

5

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

156

36%

LEVEL 2

139

32%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

116

34%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

317

48%

LEVEL 2

220

33%

LEVEL 3

108

16%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 783

LEVEL 1

365

47%

LEVEL 2

238

30%

LEVEL 3

151

19%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

298
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,116

LEVEL 1

477

43%

LEVEL 2

341

31%

LEVEL 3

230

21%

LEVEL 4

68

6%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

264
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,090

LEVEL 1

468

43%

LEVEL 2

358

33%

LEVEL 3

212

19%

LEVEL 4

52

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.