Skip to Content
Main content

GLOVERSVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

253

48%

LEVEL 2

158

30%

LEVEL 3

87

17%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

263

47%

LEVEL 2

166

29%

LEVEL 3

90

16%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

107

42%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

120

41%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

146

54%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

143

52%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

215

49%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

217

47%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

172

41%

LEVEL 2

139

33%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

174

38%

LEVEL 2

146

32%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

81

79%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

89

81%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

85

41%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

168

53%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

201

52%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.