BRUSHTON-MOIRA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

146

42%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

152

45%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

65

38%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

77

46%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

87

51%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

150

45%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

115

41%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

103

38%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

52

76%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

49

70%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

31

29%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

114

50%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

121

51%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

136

42%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

148

44%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

139

41%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.