MALONE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

217

45%

LEVEL 2

161

34%

LEVEL 3

78

16%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

77

41%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

133

50%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

132

39%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

204

44%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

108

34%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

158

39%

LEVEL 2

152

37%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

59

87%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

81

49%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

147

57%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

18

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

101
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

134

39%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

99
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

211

45%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

77

16%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

133

39%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

99
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

212

45%

LEVEL 2

157

34%

LEVEL 3

77

16%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

102
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

134

39%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

100
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

206

44%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.