BEN FRANKLIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

152

41%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

144

38%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

97

51%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

90

46%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

19

56%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

75

76%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

62

83%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

107
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

141

39%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

128
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

123

34%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

11

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

21

95%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

30

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

104

51%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

107

47%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

106
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

147

41%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

128
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.