ORCHARD PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

822
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,353

LEVEL 1

139

10%

LEVEL 2

392

29%

LEVEL 3

550

41%

LEVEL 4

272

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

825
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,405

LEVEL 1

171

12%

LEVEL 2

409

29%

LEVEL 3

498

35%

LEVEL 4

327

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

464
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

38

6%

LEVEL 2

156

24%

LEVEL 3

291

44%

LEVEL 4

173

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

461
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 700

LEVEL 1

56

8%

LEVEL 2

183

26%

LEVEL 3

259

37%

LEVEL 4

202

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

358
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

101

15%

LEVEL 2

236

34%

LEVEL 3

259

37%

LEVEL 4

99

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

364
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 705

LEVEL 1

115

16%

LEVEL 2

226

32%

LEVEL 3

239

34%

LEVEL 4

125

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

16

52%

LEVEL 4

10

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

746
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,244

LEVEL 1

125

10%

LEVEL 2

373

30%

LEVEL 3

501

40%

LEVEL 4

245

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

756
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,291

LEVEL 1

149

12%

LEVEL 2

386

30%

LEVEL 3

460

36%

LEVEL 4

296

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

19

53%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

792
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,170

LEVEL 1

59

5%

LEVEL 2

319

27%

LEVEL 3

524

45%

LEVEL 4

268

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

792
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,220

LEVEL 1

88

7%

LEVEL 2

340

28%

LEVEL 3

470

39%

LEVEL 4

322

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

80

44%

LEVEL 2

73

40%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

83

45%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

821
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,348

LEVEL 1

136

10%

LEVEL 2

391

29%

LEVEL 3

550

41%

LEVEL 4

271

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

823
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,398

LEVEL 1

167

12%

LEVEL 2

408

29%

LEVEL 3

496

35%

LEVEL 4

327

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

739
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,157

LEVEL 1

89

8%

LEVEL 2

329

28%

LEVEL 3

490

42%

LEVEL 4

249

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

745
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,216

LEVEL 1

125

10%

LEVEL 2

346

28%

LEVEL 3

443

36%

LEVEL 4

302

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

821
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,395

LEVEL 1

170

12%

LEVEL 2

404

29%

LEVEL 3

495

35%

LEVEL 4

326

23%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.