TONAWANDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

120

25%

LEVEL 2

167

34%

LEVEL 3

136

28%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

142

28%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

133

26%

LEVEL 4

62

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

97

37%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

81

32%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

102

25%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

144

34%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

14

35%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

134

34%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

75

18%

LEVEL 2

150

36%

LEVEL 3

128

31%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

58

65%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

67

69%

LEVEL 2

24

25%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

199
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

111

24%

LEVEL 2

162

34%

LEVEL 3

136

29%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

195
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

131

26%

LEVEL 2

172

35%

LEVEL 3

133

27%

LEVEL 4

62

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

84

31%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

110

36%

LEVEL 2

112

37%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

197
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

117

25%

LEVEL 2

162

34%

LEVEL 3

135

28%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.