Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

120

18%

LEVEL 2

214

31%

LEVEL 3

214

31%

LEVEL 4

135

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

362
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 786

LEVEL 1

151

19%

LEVEL 2

273

35%

LEVEL 3

224

28%

LEVEL 4

138

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

195
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

89

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

81

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

92

22%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

108

26%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

314
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

99

16%

LEVEL 2

190

32%

LEVEL 3

192

32%

LEVEL 4

122

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

322
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

126

18%

LEVEL 2

244

35%

LEVEL 3

197

28%

LEVEL 4

125

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

342
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

73

12%

LEVEL 2

182

30%

LEVEL 3

207

35%

LEVEL 4

135

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

350
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

88

13%

LEVEL 2

244

36%

LEVEL 3

213

31%

LEVEL 4

137

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

47

55%

LEVEL 2

32

37%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

63

61%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

349
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

116

17%

LEVEL 2

213

31%

LEVEL 3

214

32%

LEVEL 4

135

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

289
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

79

16%

LEVEL 2

140

28%

LEVEL 3

169

33%

LEVEL 4

120

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

87

15%

LEVEL 2

210

35%

LEVEL 3

181

30%

LEVEL 4

121

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

74

42%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

64

34%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.