GLOBAL CONCEPTS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

101

23%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

89

21%

LEVEL 2

161

39%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

98

40%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

53

27%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

67

23%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

149

39%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

154
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

33

47%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

49

40%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

74

24%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.