Skip to Content
Main content

LACKAWANNA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

220

61%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

230

63%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

31

8%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

79

48%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

85

51%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

141

71%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

145

73%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

144

60%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

143

62%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

35

59%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

37

61%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

39

66%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

153

53%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

169

57%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

67

89%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

61

88%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

150

53%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

161

55%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

31

11%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

70

90%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

69

90%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

34

49%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

202

64%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

196

66%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

21

7%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.