Skip to Content
Main content

HAMBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

450
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 823

LEVEL 1

116

14%

LEVEL 2

257

31%

LEVEL 3

299

36%

LEVEL 4

151

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

364
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

153

20%

LEVEL 2

251

33%

LEVEL 3

282

37%

LEVEL 4

82

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

243
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

148

38%

LEVEL 4

95

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

152

42%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

207
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

76

17%

LEVEL 2

152

35%

LEVEL 3

151

35%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

138

34%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

423
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 762

LEVEL 1

106

14%

LEVEL 2

233

31%

LEVEL 3

281

37%

LEVEL 4

142

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

340
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

139

19%

LEVEL 2

234

33%

LEVEL 3

265

37%

LEVEL 4

75

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

435
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

62

9%

LEVEL 2

216

30%

LEVEL 3

286

40%

LEVEL 4

149

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

95

15%

LEVEL 2

214

33%

LEVEL 3

265

40%

LEVEL 4

81

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

54

49%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

58

51%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

369
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

68

11%

LEVEL 2

202

32%

LEVEL 3

240

38%

LEVEL 4

129

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

291
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

92

16%

LEVEL 2

203

35%

LEVEL 3

221

38%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

48

26%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.