EVANS-BRANT CSD (LAKE SHORE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

225

31%

LEVEL 2

222

31%

LEVEL 3

220

30%

LEVEL 4

55

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

260

33%

LEVEL 2

273

34%

LEVEL 3

191

24%

LEVEL 4

68

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

119

34%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

134

35%

LEVEL 3

113

30%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

137

36%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

163

39%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

21
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

45

38%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

239
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

163

29%

LEVEL 2

167

29%

LEVEL 3

190

33%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

212
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

191

31%

LEVEL 2

208

34%

LEVEL 3

153

25%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

121

21%

LEVEL 2

197

34%

LEVEL 3

207

36%

LEVEL 4

54

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

148

23%

LEVEL 2

243

38%

LEVEL 3

184

29%

LEVEL 4

68

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

104

73%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

112

75%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

126

38%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

88

23%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

158

41%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

172

41%

LEVEL 2

142

34%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.