CLARENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

544
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

85

11%

LEVEL 2

162

20%

LEVEL 3

235

30%

LEVEL 4

309

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

549
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 805

LEVEL 1

96

12%

LEVEL 2

160

20%

LEVEL 3

251

31%

LEVEL 4

298

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

300
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

56

15%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

183

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

310
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

62

16%

LEVEL 3

132

33%

LEVEL 4

178

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

244
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

106

26%

LEVEL 3

118

28%

LEVEL 4

126

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

239
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

69

17%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

120

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

11

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

11

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

18

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

16

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

478
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

69

10%

LEVEL 2

147

21%

LEVEL 3

204

29%

LEVEL 4

274

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

484
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

79

11%

LEVEL 2

140

20%

LEVEL 3

226

32%

LEVEL 4

258

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

13

48%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

11

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

535
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 705

LEVEL 1

35

5%

LEVEL 2

135

19%

LEVEL 3

227

32%

LEVEL 4

308

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

536
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

42

6%

LEVEL 2

131

18%

LEVEL 3

241

34%

LEVEL 4

295

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

50

58%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

54

56%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

495
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

57

8%

LEVEL 2

140

20%

LEVEL 3

206

30%

LEVEL 4

289

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

498
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

63

9%

LEVEL 2

131

19%

LEVEL 3

222

32%

LEVEL 4

276

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

20

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

33

29%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.