DEPEW UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

132

28%

LEVEL 2

167

36%

LEVEL 3

126

27%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

76

36%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

92

42%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

81

32%

LEVEL 2

105

42%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

142

40%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

99

25%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

14

78%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

86

22%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

123

31%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

43

57%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

152
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

156

39%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

124

27%

LEVEL 2

166

37%

LEVEL 3

125

28%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

55

23%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

164
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

130

28%

LEVEL 2

164

36%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

150
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

95

24%

LEVEL 2

156

39%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

165
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

129

28%

LEVEL 2

164

36%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.