CHEEKTOWAGA-MARYVALE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

192

28%

LEVEL 2

211

30%

LEVEL 3

193

28%

LEVEL 4

98

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

194

26%

LEVEL 2

253

34%

LEVEL 3

202

27%

LEVEL 4

93

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

111

30%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

122

30%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

11

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

124

25%

LEVEL 2

160

32%

LEVEL 3

149

30%

LEVEL 4

71

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

128

24%

LEVEL 2

186

35%

LEVEL 3

152

28%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

32

39%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

40

45%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

121

20%

LEVEL 2

189

32%

LEVEL 3

190

32%

LEVEL 4

97

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

117

19%

LEVEL 2

223

35%

LEVEL 3

200

32%

LEVEL 4

91

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

71

73%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

77

69%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

288
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

158

24%

LEVEL 2

199

31%

LEVEL 3

190

29%

LEVEL 4

98

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

292
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

154

23%

LEVEL 2

237

35%

LEVEL 3

199

29%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

34

69%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

40

68%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

53

15%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

146

36%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

141

36%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

291
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

189

27%

LEVEL 2

208

30%

LEVEL 3

193

28%

LEVEL 4

98

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

292
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

190

26%

LEVEL 2

252

34%

LEVEL 3

199

27%

LEVEL 4

93

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.