Skip to Content
Main content

CHEEKTOWAGA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

268

47%

LEVEL 2

171

30%

LEVEL 3

92

16%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

295

51%

LEVEL 2

142

25%

LEVEL 3

89

16%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

99

36%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

122

46%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

169

58%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

173

57%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

16

44%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

85

35%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

97

42%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

136

64%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

139

64%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

24

50%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

36

62%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

194

41%

LEVEL 2

157

33%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

217

44%

LEVEL 2

138

28%

LEVEL 3

87

18%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

74

82%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

78

93%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

256

47%

LEVEL 2

168

31%

LEVEL 3

92

17%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

276

50%

LEVEL 2

139

25%

LEVEL 3

88

16%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

19

83%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

83

43%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

186

55%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

212

55%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

125
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

264

47%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

91

16%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

287

51%

LEVEL 2

141

25%

LEVEL 3

88

16%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.