PFC WILLIAM J GRABIARZ #79 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

140

39%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

165

42%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

102

45%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

26

39%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

25

36%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

80

51%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

35

43%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

38

36%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

63

25%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

81

60%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

102

72%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

106

34%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

130

38%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

34

77%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

35

67%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

16

40%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

22

43%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

135

43%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

154

45%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

132

39%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

162

42%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.