Skip to Content
Main content

STANLEY MAKOWSKI EARLY CHLDHD CTR GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

106

40%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

56

41%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

49

41%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

50

40%

LEVEL 2

57

46%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

62

40%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

73

39%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

72

37%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

45

50%

LEVEL 2

35

39%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

44

47%

LEVEL 2

39

41%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

84

37%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

85

35%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

22

69%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

101

42%

LEVEL 2

93

39%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

88

35%

LEVEL 2

102

41%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

103

40%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.